Margaret Sanger And The Birth Control Movement Highlighted

Margaret Sanger and the Birth Control Movement highlighted a variety of important issues. These issues include women’s right to make decisions privately versus the right of a community to regulate moral behavior; the ethnic demographics of the American people; the ability of women to control their own physical destinies by limiting family size; and the idea that small families were the way to keep the American dream alive. The debate over birth control spoke to personal and political issues, which poses the question: Was birth control merely a matter of individual choice, or was it about power, wealth, opportunity and similar issues? Birth control was not merely a technique to expand the realm of personal freedom; it grew out of a radical†¦show more content†¦To the question â€Å"Why the Woman Rebel?† Sanger wrote â€Å"Because I believe that deep down in woman’s nature lies slumbering the spirit of revolt† and â€Å"Because I believe that throu gh the efforts of individual revolution will woman’s freedom emerge†. Both highlight how birth control was not a mere technique to personal freedom, but an avenue to power. These quotes emphasize Sanger’s belief that the birth control pill would unleash the spirit of freedom amongst women. She did not argue for the open distribution of contraceptive to promote personal freedom. However, she believed that limitation on family size would free women from the dangers of childbearing and give them the opportunity to become active outside the home. In addition, Document 1 acknowledges birth control’s ability to bring about radical social class change. Sanger includes her belief that women are â€Å"enslaved by the world machine†¦middle-class morality†. Her idea of social change not only involved embracing the liberation of woman, but also the working class. It is believed that the birth control campaign succeeded as it became â€Å"a movement by an d for the middle class†. Birth control provided middle-class women the opportunity to plan families without the stress of balancing growing expenses for a child that was not planned for. In The Woman Rebel Sanger introduces birth control’s larger mission of power and opportunity for women while incorporating the basis of social class.Show MoreRelatedWoman And The New Race2076 Words   |  9 PagesWithin the literature of ‘Woman and the New Race’, Sanger challenges the extent of the use of birth control and questions whom it will benefit aside from women should it become available. According to Sanger, birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defective . For Sanger, â€Å"in compliance with nature’s working plan, we mustRead MoreThe Black Female Body : Past And Present Es say1814 Words   |  8 Pagescounter-hegemonic body politic†, discusses the domination of the black female body and how there is little discussion on how the body has been â€Å"foregrounded as a site of conquest in all efforts of colonization†. According to hooks, black bodies are rarely highlighted in a way that counters the hegemonic representation of being represented as an enslaved female, naked on the auction block, or raped by white masters and enslaved black men (hooks 67). She describes the black body as being portrayed as dirty andRead MoreJudy Chicago Dinner Party Essay6539 Words   |  27 Pagesonly then living woman represented at the table. In contrast to those of the first wing, most of the women of the third wing are familiar figures: Mary Wollstonecraft, Sojourner Truth [4], Susan B. Anthony, Emily Dickinson, Virginia Woolf, and Margaret Sanger, among others. Most of the plate images are organically abstract representations of great women who have been served up and consumed by history. 4 The Apostles were chosen as exemplars who struggled to change and improve the condition of womenRead MoreHISTORICAL CONTEXT OF NURSING5706 Words   |  23 Pagesfamilies to care for the sick and to assist with childbirth Palestinians Under the leadership of Moses, the Hebrews that settled in Palestine developed a system of laws called the Mosaic Code, which was one of the first organized methods of disease control and prevention. It contained public health laws that dictated personal, family, and public hygiene. Examples include: â€Å"do not eat meat of dead animals 3 days old† and â€Å"isolate individuals with communicable diseases.† Little information on nursingRead MoreMidterm Review Essay9272 Words   |  38 Pagespoint | 6.) In the nineteenth century, pools, trusts, and mergers were: | a) | unheard of. | | b) | used only rarely. | | c) | against the law. | | d) | seen as beneficial by consumers. | | e) | ways that manufacturers sought to control the marketplace. | | | 0 / 1 point | 7.) Between 1897 and 1904, a wave of financial mergers led to the creation of the following corporations, all of which dominated major parts of the economy EXCEPT: | a) | U.S. Steel. | | b) | J.P

Womens Rights at the Turn of the Century Free Essays

Women’s Rights At The Turn Of The Century Elisha Enlow 11/24/2012 â€Å"I am woman, hear me roar,† (â€Å"Helen reddy -,† ) was definitely not a term known to the American way of life at the turn of the century. Women were nothing more than shadows of their husbands and the housekeeper of the home and children. Fitting for the term â€Å"barefoot and pregnant,† as that was the common role of most women. We will write a custom essay sample on Womens Rights at the Turn of the Century or any similar topic only for you Order Now With many battles before them there were courageous women that would not settle, but laid the foundation that paved the way for women to experience a life beyond the shadow of the husband and the walls of the family home. A woman’s place would eventually begin to evolve, but this was a long tedious process that took years of stepping out and declaring their own freedom and rights separate of that of their husbands. During the turn of the century there were many things a woman could not legally do. They could not vote, hold public office in any state, have access to higher education and were even excluded in the professional workplace. The law had accepted and established a woman’s place was in the home, and her legal identity was that of her husband. Therefore, she could not sue, or be sued, nor could she make a legal contract or own property. She was not permitted to control her own wages or gain custody of her children in the event of a separation or divorce (Womans Rights). There were many influential women, even in the late 1700’s that had a vision for more. Catherine Beecher (1800-1878) and Sarah Hale (1788-1879) were part of the first efforts to expand women’s roles through moral influence. Beecher, the eldest sister of Harriet Beecher Stowe, was one of the nation’s most prominent educator’s prior to the civil war. Hale led the successful campaign to make Thanksgiving a national holiday, and also composed the well-known nursery rhyme â€Å"Mary had a Little Lamb. Frances Wright (1795-1852), a Scottish born reformer and lecturer spread her radical ideas about birth control, brought divorce laws and legal rights for married women. Then the first women to receive a degree in medicine was Elizabeth Blackwell in 1849. Phoebe Palmer (1807-1874) became a Methodist preacher known through-out the America’s and Canada (Mitz, S. , 2011). It was during the 19th century employment opportunities began to open up more for women. Women began to have fewer children and were not having them so young. The first half of the 19th century there were many improvements in women’s status, however they still lacked political and economic status when compared to men. A decade into the 21st Century, women’s progress can be seen- and celebrated, across a range of fields. Although we have not arrived yet, certain conclusions are nonetheless clear A statement made by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit, as she declared a tipping point for women, â€Å"When we liberate the economic potential of women, we elevate the economic performance of communities, nations and the world,† she said. There is a simulative and ripple effect that kicks in when women have greater access to jobs and the economic lives of our countries. † Greater political stability. Fewer military conflicts. More Food. More education opportunities for children. By harnessing the economic potential of all women, we boost opportunity for all people† (E llison, J. , 2011). World War 1 affected women’s roles with a shortage of men needed to produce the massive amounts of war materials needed. Women were needed to work outside of the home. All of a sudden women and young girls could make a decent wage doing work normally done by men. This opened up a new world to many women who had lived in the countryside who were now taking jobs in the larger cities, riding buses, trains and even boats to escape poverty, or see new t hings. The war enabled them to test tanks, airplanes, weapons and perform other duties that formally had been male functions (Goodwin, R. , 2008). The 19th Amendment guarantees all American women the right to vote. Beginning in the mid-19th century, several generations of women’s suffrage supporters lectured, wrote, marched, lobbied and practiced civil disobedience to achieve what many Americans considered a radical change to the constitution. Few early supporters lived to see final victory in 1920 (www. ourdocument. gov, January 11, 2012). Progress was taking place in many different directions and avenues in the American life. Women struggling to find economic independence, and their place outside of the home proved to be a very long and challenging journey. Though there was some break-through with a few women receiving education and prestige, the doors were still not open to all. Let’s look at a timeline of a few events that had taken place that helped the movement of women’s suffrage into present date: * 1833 Oberlin College became the first co-educational college in the United States; 1841 Oberlin awards first academic degree to three women. * 1839 Mississippi passes first Married Women’s Property Act. * 1844 Female textile workers in Massachusetts organize the Lowell Female Labor Reform Act. 1848 The first women’s rights convention in the US is held in Seneca Falls, NY. Many participants sign a ‘Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions’ outlining main issues and goals for the emerging women’s movement. * 1849 Harriet Tubman escapes from slavery and over the next ten years she leads many slaves to freedom by the Underground Railroad. * 1859 The successful vaccination of rubber provides women with reliable condoms for birth control. * 1868 Fourteenth Amendment is ratified * 1911 (NAOWS) the National Association Opposed to Women’s Suffrage is organized. 1912 Theodore Roosevelt’s Progressive Party (Bull moose/Rep) becomes the first National political party to adopt a women’s suffrage plan * 1916 Jeanette Rankin of Montana becomes the first American woman elected to represent her state in the United States House of Representatives. * 1923 The National Women’s Party first proposes the Equal Rights Amendment to eliminate discrimination on the basis of gender. It has never been ratified (E. Susan. B. ,2011). In 1940 Eleanor Roosevelt wrote about the progress of women’s suffrage. In her own words will read the thoughts of that time. In the old day’s men always said that politics was too rough-and-tumble a business for women; but that idea is gradually wearing away. There is more truth in the statement that men have a different att itude toward politics than women. They play politics a little more like a game. With the men, it becomes a serious occupation for a few weeks before election; whereas women look upon it as a serious matter year in and year out. It is associated with their patriotism and their duty to their country. This country is no matriarchy, nor are we in any danger of being governed by women. I repeat here what I have so often said in answer to the question: â€Å"Can a women be President of the United States? † At present the answer is emphatically â€Å"No. † It will be a long time before a woman will have any chance of nomination or election. As things stand today, even if an emotional wave swept a woman into this office, her election would be valueless, as she could never hold her following long enough to put over her program. It is hard enough for a man to do that, with all the traditional schooling men have had; for a woman, it would be impossible because of the age-old prejudice. In government, in business, and in the professions there may be a day when women will be looked upon as persons. We are, however, far from that day as yet (Roosevelt, E. , 1940). In the business and professional world women have made great advances. In many fields there is opportunity for them to work with men on an equal footing. To be sure, sometimes prejudice on the score of sex will be unfair and a woman will have to prove her ability and do better work than a man to gain the same recognition. If you will look at the picture of Mrs. Bloomer, made a hundred years ago, and think of the women today in factories, offices, executive positions, and professions, that picture alone will symbolize for you the distance women have traveled in less than a century (Roosevelt, E. , 1940). As the end of the 19th Century was drawing nigh, the accomplishments of women was growing like never before. Perhaps technology was to help with this as more and more families were finding access. With the radio and TV industry, it was bringing opportunities to women that were new and unique. Women were cast in TV shows, and becoming household names. Radio waves were being taken over by upcoming female voices that wanted to be heard. Life was changing indeed. Was this a slow change? Yes, but it was a change that would impact the shape of America from here on. Today’s generation can only read about the suffrage of women, and I know they find it hard to believe or comprehend just how far women have traveled in America to be known. From the shadows of man (their husbands) that women once hid behind, found their identity in, and trusted to make every decision for them to the twentieth century were it is only deemed odd to not see a woman involved in just about every aspect of life. From the centers of the home and shadows of the man have emerged beautiful, intelligent, powerful women who have shaped our country and helped to make it a better place. Whether it be teachers, business professionals, athletes, war hero’s, state offices, government, lawyers, doctors, astronauts, rabbi’s, preachers, airplane pilots, musicians, artist, rodeo, it is definite true that- women have made their mark on the fingerprints of the United States and are not going anywhere. I am woman- hear me roar! Here is to all woman of the past, the present and future generations. Be confident and bold and walk in such a way that you know where you’ve come from and even better,you know where you are going. There is nothing that can stop you now, if you set your mind to it. Gone are the days of no right’s and hiding in the shadows finding identity in the husband. Embrace the value you have and press on†¦there is no way to go but forward! References Mintz, S. (2011, 12 03). Digital history. Retrieved from http://www. digitalhistory. uh. du/database/article_display. cfm? HHID=630 Godwin, R. (Janu). Helium. Retrieved from http://www. helium. com/items/785688-a-look-at-1900s-men-and-women-roles Gillett, F. H. (2008). Retrieved from NARA website: http://www. ourdocuments. gov/doc. php? flash=truedoc=63 Barber, E. S. (1998). National american woman suffrage association. In Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://memory. loc. gov/ammem/naw/nawstime. html Helen reddy – i am woman lyrics. (n. d. ). Retrieved from http://www. lyricstime. com/helen-reddy-i-am-woman-lyrics. html How to cite Womens Rights at the Turn of the Century, Papers

Obtaining Remedy Element Of Actual Damage †Myassignmentrhelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Obtaining Remedy Element Of Actual Damage? Answer: Introduction This report revolves around the negligence case of Hackshaw VS Shaw. In this case, there is a tort of negligence. Tort means any wrong act by one party to another which gives rise to an illegal act or which results in an injury to the plaintiff. Basically, tort is based on breach of duty. Because of this illegal act, a civil action of a court of law occurs against the party who has committed wrong act. The major elements of tort of negligence includes: element of fault, element of obtaining remedy and element of actual damage. Element of fault arises when the plaintiff have the evidence that the party has done a tort act. In the element of obtaining remedy, the law of tort is about giving compensation to the plaintiff rather than punishing the person responsible for the tort (Barnett and Harder, 2014). The element of actual damage is related to the evidence that the plaintiff have to prove that the injury has taken place because of the tort act. This report explains the facts of the case, the issues raised by both the parties, the arguments made by the plaintiff and the defender and the judgement given by the court. The report is in the favour of plaintiff and includes a proper analysis of why the plaintiff is stronger than the defender. If a case is having these four elements then it comes under negligence case. This report also describes the evidences showed by the plaintiff to win the case. The elements are breach of duty, actual harm, duty of care and casual connection. This case has all these elements so it is a negligence case (Goudkamp and Plunkett, 2017). The visitors can be categorised as licensees, trespasser, contractual, invitees and entrants with a right. This case is related to the trespasser visitor. Elements of the tort include: Shaw was acquiring a farm for storing the petrol. The petrol was stored for farming machinery. But once at night, the petrol was being stolen. Shaw decided to find out who was stealing the petrol. Another night, Shaw was waiting near the petrol tank to see who was stealing the petrol. Suddenly, one Cox drove into Shaws farm and the headlights of the car were turned off. Hackshaw was in a stolen motor vehicle with Cox. When the Cox started stealing the petrol, two warning shots were fired by Shaw at the car because thief is standing next to the car and Hackshaw get injured by the shots as she was sitting at the front seat of the car. Later, Shaw accepted that he was unaware about Hackshaw that she was in the car. But Hackshaw wants to sue him for the injury done to her and demanding compensation for the injury. Here, the plaintiff was a trespasser. Trespasser means an intentional act by the defender to injure the plaintiff (Loughnan, 2017). The elements of trespass include no lawful justification, intentional fault and injury caused to the plaintiff. Issues Raised by plaintiff: The defendant has breached the duty of care towards the plaintiff. Though the defendant is the owner of the land but it is his responsibility to follow the duty of care. Due to the irresponsibility of the defendant towards the duty of care, the plaintiff is being injured. Shaw does not have any right to injure Hackshaw because of the reason that she has entered in his property without permission. Did the defendant breach the duty of care? In the given case, is the defender responsible for providing the duty to give safety measures to the people in his property? Did the defender know that a person other than Cox was sitting in the car? Raised by defendant: According to the defendant, it is the mistake of the plaintiff that she entered in the property of the defendant without his permission. Shaw accepted that he did not know about the fact that plaintiff was sitting in the car (Dyson, 2015). Another issue raised by the defendant is that the plaintiff was responsible for her safety. The plaintiff was involved in the criminal act at the time of injury. Arguments In this case it was argued by the plaintiff that the defender owes a duty of care against the plaintiff that his rifle did not injure the plaintiff. It was also argued by Hackshaw that Shaw was aware about the fact that Hackshaw was sitting on the front seat still he started firing on the car without thinking about the injury that could be done to Hackshaw due to his rifle (Cane, 2017). But Shaw denied this argument. The law does not allow any person to shoot the other person who has entered his or her property without taking his or her permission. Another argument is related to restriction on the use of excessive force by the land owner. The defendant argued that he fired on the engine of the car. If the defendant was aware that someone other than Cox was in the car, was he guilty of the negligence done by him? Can a trespasser can sue the owner of the property if the trespasser becomes injured on his or her property. Judgement of the court The court made the decision in favour of the plaintiff. As it is the liability of the occupier and as per the duty of care, the occupier is responsible for the security of any person which has entered his property. So, Shaw has to shoot in such a way that it could not harm anyone (Walmsley, et al., 2015). For the negligence of the passenger sitting in the car, the farmer was held responsible. The defender is defending himself by the statement that he was not aware whether someone is there inside the car but according to the court it is his duty to take due care while shooting. Shooting at the car leads to the danger of injuring a person in the vehicle, which would have been reasonably foreseen by the farmer. According to the High court of Australia, if a land owner injures a thief by using unreasonable force then the land owner is liable for the injury done to the thief and the land owner is also responsible to provide compensation to the thief for the injury done to him or her. As p er the rules of court, the use of rifle was considered as excessive force and it increases the risk of injury to the plaintiff. The court gave the decision that Shaw has to provide compensation to the plaintiff for the mistake done by Mr. Shaw whether intentionally or negligently (Ryan, 2017). Critical analysis The report is in the favour of plaintiff i.e. Miss. Hackshaw. She is the girlfriend of the thief according to the case. The judgement of the court was in favour of plaintiff because the plaintiff was having all the evidences that proved this case as a case of negligence (Quill and Friel, 2016). First point to be considered is the breach of the duty of care. It is duty of the defender to make sure that nobody is sitting in the car before shooting. The defenders main target is the thief next to car but he has injured an innocent person negligently. The plaintiff won the case because her case is stronger than the defender because she gets injured because of the defender which proves his carelessness in performing the duty of care (Bartlett, 2017). Hackshaw had contributed to the injury by illegally entering Shaws property. The court also considers the risk of injury to the plaintiff whether the risk is less, medium or high and also the age of the plaintiff. Here, the risk of injury is h igh and the age of the plaintiff was just 17 years. The defendant owed a duty of care under the principles of negligence to the plaintiff. Shaw does not have the power to harm the person entering to his property without taking his permission. If any person is on the land of the occupier as trespasser, then the occupier does not have the right to give rise to the foreseeable risk of proximity. Duty from being owed cannot be prevented by the engagement of plaintiff in the illegal act at the time of injury (Fulbrook, 2017).Another critical point is that the trespasser only needs an evidence of the injury or damage rather than the actual damage. The main idea behind the compensation taken in case of tort is placing the defender in the same position at which he was before the commitment of the tort. The plaintiff gave the evidence that she was not aware about the theft and she did not know why Cox turned off the lights and she also did not know that the car was stolen. The plaintiff succ eeds in the case only because of trespass (Foley and Christensen, 2016). The occupiers liability act, 1954 has imposed a duty of care upon the occupier of land. But here in this case, the visitor came to harm the defender so in such a case also the occupier is not allowed to use excessive force to save his or her property. The occupier has the following duties towards the trespasser: risks of which the occupier has reasonable grounds to believe that they exist and he has reasonable grounds to believe that the trespasser is in the vicinity of the risks. Once the plaintiff has proved that the defendant was in breach of his duty towards her as per the Occupiers' Liability Act, she must go on to prove the facts and the damage done to her (Roy and Marsoof, 2017).After analysing the argument that can a trespasser can sue the property owner if he or she gets injured in his property then as per the analysis, the trespasser has the right to sue the property owner for the breach of the duty o f care. Law applicable to negligence Western Australia Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA) Victoria Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) Australian Capital Territory Civil Liability Act 2002 (ACT) South Australia Civil Liability Act 2002 (SA) Queensland Civil Liability Act 2002 (QLD) Tasmania Civil Liability Act 2002 (Tas) New South Wales Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Conclusion This report is prepared in the favour of plaintiff and the court has given the judgement in favour of plaintiff because the plaintiff disclosed all the evidences which proved that this is the case of negligence. The case is related to negligence and tort. The defendant has injured the plaintiff unintentionally in this case. It was the case of tort not crime because the main objective in case of crime is punishment and in case of tort is compensation. This case is related to compensation so it is a tort. The plaintiff is demanding compensation from the defender for the loss done by him. After taking into account all the issues and arguments done by both the parties i.e. defender and plaintiff, the court has given the judgement in the favour of plaintiff. The plaintiff is having the evidence of her injury and some other evidences related to the case which proves that the defender breached the duty of care and the court said that the land owner is having the duty of care towards any per son who has entered his land. According to the court, the landowner is also not required to use excessive force that can be harmful for others. At the end of the case, Shaw has to pay the compensation amount to the plaintiff and the compensation amount is equal to the amount of the loss done to the plaintiff. At the end, it is concluded that for any tort of negligence to visitors, the owner of the land should be liable for the injury done to the visitor. Even if the visitor entered the property without taking permission, the occupier owes duty of care towards him. References Barnett, K. and Harder, S. (2014) Remedies in Australian Private Law. England: Cambridge University Press. Bartlett, F. (2017) Making lawyers pay for malpractice in court: skirting advocates immunity in Australia, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 24(2), pp.109-123. Cane, P. (2017) Key Ideas in Tort Law. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Dyson, M. (2015) Comparing Tort and Crime: Learning from across and within Legal Systems. UK: Cambridge University Press. Foley, M. and Christensen, M. (2016) Negligence and the Duty of Care: A Case Study Discussion, Singapore Nursing Journal, 43(1). Fulbrook, J. (2017) Outdoor activities, negligence and the law. UK: Routledge. Goudkamp, J. and Plunkett, J. (2017) Vicarious liability in Australia: on the move, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, pp.1-9. Loughnan, A. (2017) The Very Foundations of Any System of Criminal Justice: Criminal Responsibility in the Australian Model Criminal Code, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(3), pp.8-24. Quill, E. and Friel, R. (2016) Damages and Compensation Culture: Comparative Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Roy, A. and Marsoof, A. (2017) Negligent omissions as a basis for holding internet intermediaries liable for infringements of trade mark rights: approaches under the English common law,Intellectual Property Quarterly, 1, pp.52-77. Ryan, D. (2017) FROM OPPORTUNITY TO OCCASION: VICARIOUS LIABILITY IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA, The Cambridge Law Journal, 76(1), pp.14-18. Walmsley, S., Abadee, A., Zipser, B., and Sirtes, G. (2015) Professional Liability in Australia. Australia: Thomson Reuters.

Romeo And Juliet Essays (1059 words) - , Term Papers

Romeo and Juliet It is not so much the central characters of the play, Romeo and Juliet themselves, as the minor characters that are responsible for their tragic end. I agree with this analysis to a high extent, but have also considered the other possible reasons why they died. The most commonly seen reason for Romeos and Juliets downfall would be the feud between the Capulets and the Montagues. However, the over-looked, minor characters play an important role in the downfall of Romeo and Juliet. They were constantly pushing them into secrecy and forcing them to construct a large and complex plan that results in Romeos and Juliets deaths. Tybalt is the trigger that sends Romeo and Juliet off on their downward path. He is always causing trouble and never once in appears in the play without being in the battles. One can find him constantly harassing Romeo and trying to start a fight. When Romeo finally does fight him to get revenge, he ends up killing him and thus gets exiled as the Prince promised earlier in the play. Romeo getting exiled means that when Friar Laurence and Juliet plans their devious scheme, Romeo is not able to hear about it straight away. In fact, he never hears about it, so assumes Juliet is truly dead. Paris seems to keep everything Romeo and Juliet does very hasty as he wishes to marry Juliet in two days. This means that Juliet drinks the potion that night, where she speaks her monologue in her bed. If Paris wasnt going to marry her in two days time, then she would have waited for a reply letter from Romeo. None of the confusion would have arisen. Paris doesnt love Juliet, not as Romeo does, but instead his love is only skin deep. He never really gets to know Juliet. If he did, then she may have liked Paris better than Romeo, which would completely cancel out everything else. The Prince contributes by exiling Romeo near the beginning of the play. Romeo thinks this very unfair (Tis torture and not mercy. Heaven is here, where Juliet lies.). This causes many problems. Romeo cannot hear about The Friars and Juliets plan, so he doesnt know that Juliet was still alive when he killed himself on top of her. The Prince doesnt really play much more of a part than this. The Friar doesnt play a very large part in Romeo and Juliets tragic end. He concocts the potion, but this in itself doesnt contribute to their tragic end but it is fate, in that the letter he wrote never reaches Romeo in Mantua and so he doesnt know of the Friars plan. The Friar is always giving council to Romeo and Juliet and is really only ever helping the two lovers. The only thing wrong he does is to marry Romeo and Juliet just a few days after they meet. This is not good because it is too hasty as he points out when he says, These violent delights have violent ends which comes true within the next two acts. Capulet is the worst offender. He never allows Juliet to marry Romeo, because Romeo is a Montague. Therefore, Romeo and Juliet cannot have a normal relationship and must keep their love for each other well. Capulet also changes his mind very quickly. Near the beginning of the play he answers to Pariss query that Juliet is still too young to woo Juliet and that he should wait two years. Later on in the play, which is only a couple of days later, he tells Paris that he shall wed Juliet in two days time. This causes all sorts of problems. It means that Juliet must seek help from the Friar that introduces many more things that could have gone wrong. The Nurse also does not help. She tells Juliet to perform bigamy by marrying her to both Romeo and Paris. At the beginning of the act, she is on Romeos side and is paying out Paris. After that she rapidly changes and starts preferring Paris instead of Romeo. Romeos a disclout to him The Nurse quotes. She suggests Juliet should marry Paris. Even though, the Nurse never goes out to hurt Juliet.